Archive for the Newsletters Category

$6.7 Million Legal Fee Request Trimmed to $4.4 Million in Arizona Racial Profiling Case

Posted On October 15th, 2014 by Legal Fee Advisors

Arizona U.S. District Court Judge Grant Murray Snow issued a ruling on September 11, 2014, awarding $4.4 million in legal fees to attorneys who won a racial profiling case against Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office. [1]The award will be split amongst four plaintiffs groups who collectively helped prove that the Sherriff’s Office had discriminated against Latinos […] Read More...

Posted in Newsletters2 Responses »

California Appellate Court Rules that Firm Size Alone Should Not Control Plaintiff’s Recovery of Attorneys’ Fees

Posted On October 8th, 2014 by Legal Fee Advisors

In a September 2014 decision, Save Our Neighborhood Group v. City of Lancaster (AV California, LLC), a California appellate court declared that the trial court abused its discretion in relying solely on law firm size to calculate the plaintiff’s award of attorneys’ fees. In this case, the plaintiff Save Our Neighborhood Group (SONG), a non-profit […] Read More...

Posted in NewslettersComments Off on California Appellate Court Rules that Firm Size Alone Should Not Control Plaintiff’s Recovery of Attorneys’ Fees

Inefficient and Excessive Billing Results in Attorney Fee Reduction of 70 Percent

Posted On October 1st, 2014 by Legal Fee Advisors

A U.S. District Court Judge slashed the requested attorney fees for a recent $32 million class action settlement by over $5 million.[1] The law firms were requesting fees of $8 million, but Judge Edward Davila of the Northern District of California found only $2.4 million in fees to be justified, resulting in a reduction of […] Read More...

Posted in NewslettersComments Off on Inefficient and Excessive Billing Results in Attorney Fee Reduction of 70 Percent

Apple Denied Attorney’s Fees in Case Applying Supreme Court’s New Standard

Posted On September 24th, 2014 by Legal Fee Advisors

In a recent Supreme Court case, Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.,[1] the United States Supreme Court held that a party that prevails under the Lanham Act (the major federal statute governing United States trademark law) is entitled to attorney’s fees in “exceptional cases.”  An exceptional case “stands out from others with […] Read More...

Posted in NewslettersComments Off on Apple Denied Attorney’s Fees in Case Applying Supreme Court’s New Standard

Defendant Unilever Pleads the Court to Cut Over 50% of Plaintiff’s Attorneys’ Fees Claiming Unjustifiable Windfall

Posted On September 17th, 2014 by Legal Fee Advisors

As reported in a National Law Journal article of August 14, 2014, Unilever settled a class action brought by plaintiffs in the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, alleging that they suffered hair loss and scalp injury as a result of a product, Suave Professionals Keratin Infusion 30 day smoothing kit, which was […] Read More...

Posted in NewslettersComments Off on Defendant Unilever Pleads the Court to Cut Over 50% of Plaintiff’s Attorneys’ Fees Claiming Unjustifiable Windfall

Incorporating Practical Skills into Law School Curriculums

Posted On September 10th, 2014 by Legal Fee Advisors

Earlier this year we asked whether law schools are adequately developing their students’ practical and professional skills. [See Legal Fee Advisors’ publications: Are Law Schools Missing The Boat When It Comes To Training Lawyers:  How To Fairly Bill For Their Services?]. We also highlighted some of the limitations of, and alternatives to classroom learning. [It […] Read More...

Posted in Newsletters2 Responses »

A Recent Interpretation of Fee-Shifting Statutes from the Wisconsin Supreme Court

Posted On September 3rd, 2014 by Legal Fee Advisors

 In a recent decision, Betz v. Diamond Jim’s Auto Sales,[1] the Wisconsin Supreme Court considered whether a plaintiff’s attorney is entitled to statutory attorney’s fees when, without the knowledge or approval of the attorney, the plaintiff and defendant enter into a settlement agreement that does not discuss attorney’s fees. The Court recognized that if clients […] Read More...

Posted in NewslettersComments Off on A Recent Interpretation of Fee-Shifting Statutes from the Wisconsin Supreme Court

California Judge Slashes Legal Fees For Excessive and Inefficient Billing

Posted On August 27th, 2014 by Legal Fee Advisors

A California Superior Court Judge recently slashed the $1.15 million requested by attorneys after the settlement of a Marin County Welfare case by more than $700,000.[1]  The attorneys said the time they spent during a three-year legal battle fighting to reform a welfare program was worth at least $2.4 million, but they ended up with […] Read More...

Posted in Newsletters1 Response »

DLA Piper Settles $22.5M Suit Over Accused Overbilling of Legal Bills

Posted On August 20th, 2014 by Legal Fee Advisors

The well renowned law firm DLA Piper has reached a confidential settlement in its highly controversial suit stemming from unpaid legal fees. Adam H. Victor, an energy industry executive, was sued by DLA Piper for not paying a portion of his legal bills in the amount of $675,000, which he claimed were excessive. In response, […] Read More...

Posted in NewslettersComments Off on DLA Piper Settles $22.5M Suit Over Accused Overbilling of Legal Bills

Income Partners are on the Rise

Posted On August 13th, 2014 by Legal Fee Advisors

Dual partnership tiers are becoming entrenched in law firm culture as numbers of non-equity partners continues to climb. According to a current survey by The American Lawyer (a sibling publication of The New Jersey Law Journal), a mere 17 of the 100 top-grossing law firms are made up of only one tier of equity partners.[1] […] Read More...

Posted in NewslettersComments Off on Income Partners are on the Rise