Author Archive

Attorney’s lack of billing judgment justifies a 50 percent reduction in the attorney’s fee award

Posted On February 26th, 2014 by Legal Fee Advisors

In a 2013 decision, the Supreme Court of Wyoming affirmed the trial court’s decision awarding the court appointed attorney $24,358.50 in attorney’s fees, following a 50 percent reduction of the attorney’s fee application (In re NRF, 2013 WY 9, 294 P3d 879, 883 [Wyo 2013]). In March 2009, the attorney was appointed by the court […] Read More...

Posted in Newsletters • Comments Off on Attorney’s lack of billing judgment justifies a 50 percent reduction in the attorney’s fee award

Apple requests disqualification of Compliance Monitor, citing inappropriate financial stake and exorbitant hourly rate

Posted On February 19th, 2014 by Legal Fee Advisors

When is an excessive fee still considered “fair”? Apparently, to some, it can be if the lawyer is court-appointed. Defendant Apple has asked that attorney Michael Bromwich be removed from his position as external compliance monitor in an ongoing e-books antitrust suit, objecting to the attorney’s excessive hourly rate and “financial interest in the proceedings.”[1] […] Read More...

Posted in Newsletters • Comments Off on Apple requests disqualification of Compliance Monitor, citing inappropriate financial stake and exorbitant hourly rate

New York Judge slashes Winston & Strawn’s $20,000 fee request for billing excessive hours and unreasonable attorney rates

Posted On February 12th, 2014 by Legal Fee Advisors

In December of last year, a Magistrate judge in the Southern District reduced law firm Winston & Strawn’s fee request by more than 80% in a pro bono case against New York City, finding the hours claimed by the firm to be excessive and the attorney rates unsupported by evidence of the attorneys’ experience. (Alli […] Read More...

Posted in Newsletters • Comments Off on New York Judge slashes Winston & Strawn’s $20,000 fee request for billing excessive hours and unreasonable attorney rates

Court of Appeals of Indiana: Attorneys’ Fees Awarded Should Be Proportionate to the Claims Prevailed On

Posted On February 5th, 2014 by Legal Fee Advisors

In a July 2013 decision, the Court of Appeals of Indiana, in the case of Longest v Sledge, 2013 WL 3744095 (Ind. App., 2013), awarded attorney fees for only one quarter of the billed hours, and reduced the attorney’s hourly rate to a rate prevailing in the community. The consequence of this decision was almost […] Read More...

Posted in Newsletters • 1 Response »

Federal District Court: Limited success justifies an 80% reduction of requested attorneys’ fees award

Posted On January 29th, 2014 by Legal Fee Advisors

In a recent decision, the Northern District of California, [Moralez v Whole Foods Mkt., Inc., 2013 WL 3967639 [ND Cal July, 2013] reduced requested attorneys’ fees by 80%, due to the plaintiff’s limited success on the merits and poor descriptions of services. In March 2012 a wheelchair user brought an action against Whole Foods Market, […] Read More...

Posted in Newsletters • Comments Off on Federal District Court: Limited success justifies an 80% reduction of requested attorneys’ fees award

Are Law Schools Missing The Boat When It Comes To Training Lawyers How To Fairly Bill For Their Services?

Posted On January 22nd, 2014 by Legal Fee Advisors

Recently, Nicole Black posted a MyCase blog entitled Things You Didn’t Learn in Law School: Billing. Ms. Black’s point is this: law schools do not prepare their students on how to fairly and correctly bill clients.  Nicole gave an example of a lawyer who somehow saw it fit to bill his client for a 29 […] Read More...

Posted in Newsletters • Comments Off on Are Law Schools Missing The Boat When It Comes To Training Lawyers How To Fairly Bill For Their Services?

How much is too much when it comes to Billing for Temporary Lawyers?

Posted On January 15th, 2014 by Legal Fee Advisors

A Law Blog by Jacob Gershman entitled The Am Roundup: Dispute over Cost of Temp-Help Lawyers, discusses the practice of law firms hiking up the billable hour rate of temporary legal help in class action suits.  The blog demonstrates just how easy it is for lawyers to stretch their billable rates when complicated litigations are […] Read More...

Posted in Newsletters • Comments Off on How much is too much when it comes to Billing for Temporary Lawyers?

North Dakota Court: Attorney must return unearned portion of a “nonrefundable minimum fee”

Posted On January 8th, 2014 by Legal Fee Advisors

A July, 2013 decision by the Supreme Court of North Dakota, in the case of In re Disciplinary Action Against Hoffman, 2013 ND 137, 2013 WL 3804043 (N.D., 2013), ordered an attorney to return the unearned portion of a “nonrefundable minimum fee” defined in a written legal services contract, executed by the parties. In July, […] Read More...

Posted in Newsletters • Comments Off on North Dakota Court: Attorney must return unearned portion of a “nonrefundable minimum fee”

California Court: $1.3 Million fee request substantially rejected in Kellogg class action settlement, due in part, to lack of billing detail

Posted On January 6th, 2014 by Legal Fee Advisors

In November, 2013, a California district court judge significantly reduced an attorney’s fee award sought by plaintiffs’ counsel pursuant to settlement of a class action suit against the Kellogg Company. The action, originally brought by plaintiffs in 2009, alleged that Kellogg had made false and misleading statements on their website, claiming that consumption of their […] Read More...

Posted in Newsletters • 1 Response »